Discussion:
— ONLY BY RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG {#224 / #229} HE WAS
(too old to reply)
dolf
2018-04-14 07:50:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
— ONLY BY RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG {#224 /
#229} HE WAS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 April 2018

EDITORIAL (INDEPENDENT.CO.UK) @ 2001 HOURS ON 14 APRIL 2018: “ONLY BY
RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG HE WAS.

So far as can be judged the BBC's treatment is ideally suited to Powell’s
speech. For every paragraph contained assumptions, delusions, sly elisions
and, more than likely, partial or complete fabrications.

For that we should be grateful, and is that not also a reason to bury
Powell’s words, rather than to resurrect them?

No, because every nation has a duty to face up to its past, as the BBC will
also be doing in a landmark documentary series next week on Stephen
Lawrence. Powell’s views also need attention because, whether consciously
or not, there are still many who hold the view that what Powell was saying
was right: specifically that someone of black or brown skin – or, nowadays,
of Eastern European heritage – cannot be ‘British’, or at least would find
it difficult to be so.

That, in essence, was the base of Powellism, and, as we see all around us
every day, why Enoch has in due course been proved wrong. For black, Asian
and other ethnic minority communities made and are making still an
outstanding contribution to British life. They are British, the same as
anyone else, and proud of it.”

<https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/enoch-powell-speech-bbc-radio-4-how-wrong-he-was-a8303416.html>

The immediate problem is the OPPORTUNISM provided by the in situ CATEGORIES
OF UNDERSTANDING of #224 / #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of
War assigned to Roman Empire Governance Transformation Prototype #EIGHT
{#120 / #360} and #342 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs assigned to Roman
Empire Governance Prototype #SIX {#114 / #342} which could lead to an
implicit bias as acquiescence that is granted towards HETEROS {ie.
essentially racialism: @1 - marriage / @5 - phallus as patrimony
traditional family values} rather than HOMOIOS {ie. a better paradigm for a
multi-cultural society} derived governance and which may be consistent with
his national / organisational / educational identity:

“John Enoch Powell MBE (16 June 1912 – 8 February 1998), was a British
politician, classical scholar, philologist and poet. He served as a
Conservative Member of Parliament (MP, 1950–74), Ulster Unionist Party
(UUP) MP (1974–87), and Minister of Health (1960–63).

Before entering politics, Powell was a classical scholar, becoming a full
professor of ancient Greek at the age of 25 in Australia. During World War
II, he served in both staff and intelligence positions, reaching the rank
of brigadier in his early thirties. He also wrote poetry {cf: observe his
dialectic}; his first works being published in 1937, as well as many books
on classical and political subjects.

Powell became a national figure following his 20 April 1968 address to the
General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre,
which became known as the "Rivers of Blood" speech. It pointedly criticised
mass immigration into the UK, especially from the New Commonwealth and
opposed the then–proposed anti-discrimination legislation Race Relations
Bill being mooted at the time. In response, Conservative Party leader
Edward Heath sacked Powell from his position as Shadow Defence Secretary
(1965–1968) in the Conservative opposition.”
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell>]
<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie.
hymeneal as marriage / sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as
Genitive Voluntātus} Empire Governance]

THE QUEEN, THE POPE AND ENOCH POWELL
Papal jurisdiction was the subject of a memorable letter to The Times by
Enoch Powell (then an Ulster Unionist MP) published on 24th March 1982, on
the eve of Pope John Paul II’s visit to Great Britain.

Powell concluded that it is ‘constitutionally and logically impossible for
England to contain both the Queen and the Pope’, on account of their
conflicting claims of authority.  The Queen is ‘on earth the Supreme
Governor of the Church of England’, the Pope is ‘Christ’s Vicar upon the
earth’.

It is significant that the word earth is used twice.  Powell sees authority
in territorial rather than functional terms.

The letter implies that the Pope’s claim includes a claim of territorial
jurisdiction over England.  However, canon 331 of the Code of Canon Law
1983 describes the Pope as ‘Vicar of Christ and pastor of the Universal
Church on earth’.  In that capacity, the Pope enjoys ‘supreme, full,
immediate and universal ordinary power in the Church’.

Thus canon 331 does not exactly describe the Pope as Vicar of Christ upon
the earth.  It does not claim a political jurisdiction over the earth.  The
Pope’s authority is over the Church, rather than over the earth.  His
jurisdiction is limited to the Church.

Canon 747 reinforces this point.  It provides that the Church ‘has the
innate duty and right to preach the Gospel to all nations, independent of
any human power whatever … to announce moral principles, including those
pertaining to the social order, and to make judgments on any human
affairs’.

This account of papal jurisdiction makes clear that it is religious, not
political.  It extends no further than the proclamation of the Christian
religion, as the Church defines this.

It may, of course, be objected that there can be no dichotomy between the
religious and the political.  The Pope’s claim to be Vicar of Christ is
religious.  The Church’s duty to proclaim the Gospel is likewise a
religious duty, derived from the Lord’s command to make disciples of all
nations.  However, the Church’s ability to proclaim the Gospel to all
nations is relevant to the governments of those nations.

To this extent the Church’s right to preach the Gospel is a political
question, as well as a religious one.  The duty to proclaim the Gospel is a
religious matter.  The right to proclaim the Gospel in a particular nation
is a political matter.

The political right of the Church to proclaim the Gospel, asserted in canon
747, is based on the principle of religious freedom, not any claim
of territorial jurisdiction.  Canon 11 of the 1983 Code makes clear that
‘merely ecclesiastical laws bind [only] those baptised in the Catholic
Church or received into it’.  Canon 748(2) is emphatic that ‘Persons cannot
ever be forced … to embrace the Catholic faith against their conscience’.

This answers Powell’s suggestion that the Pope’s claim to be Vicar of
Christ conflicts with the Monarch’s supremacy over the Church of England. 
The Church of England is obviously not part of the Roman Catholic Church. 
Thus members of the Church of England are not expected to observe Roman
Catholic laws or embrace the Catholic faith, unless they freely choose to
do so.

The Monarch likewise permits her Catholic subjects to practice their
religion.  The Pope makes no political claim on England, only a religious
claim.  The Monarch makes a political claim on her Catholic subjects, but
no religious claim.  A conflict of territorial claims is avoided by mutual
acceptance of the principle of religious freedom.

Acceptance of religious freedom resolves political difficulties but not
religious ones.  The real difficulty between the Monarch and the Pope lies
not in any political claim over England, but in the Roman Catholic
religious teaching that the Church of England, of which the Monarch is
Supreme Governor, is not part of the Catholic Church.

It must be remembered that the Code of Canon Law was not promulgated until
1983, the year after Powell wrote his letter.  However, the Code itself is
based on the teaching of the second Vatican Council, which dates from the
1960s.

<https://ecclesiasticallaw.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/the-queen-the-pope-and-enoch-powell/>

HISTORICAL PARALLELISM: “Yea, ye took up the tabernacle {ie. PYTHAGOREAN
binomial conception of the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER} of Moloch {Caesar /
Pontifex Maximus as King}, and the star of your god Remphan {ie. the
combined Angelic genius Ou'RaEL = Vav (#6) + Resh (#200) + Aleph (#1) +
Lamed (#30) as derived from a 3x3 = #15 (9) matrix which is used as a
template to formulate the values for various elements as being inclusive of
AIR: #114 (#342 {ie. #341 + @1 as Cardinal Sin}) + #123 (#369) = #237 -
*USE* *OF* *FORCE*}, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will
carry you away beyond Babylon {incongruity; confusion; mixture as distinct
from congruity and ratiocination} / Damascus {a sack full of blood; the
similitude of burning}." [Acts 7:42-43; 9:2 (KJV)]

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Stoicheion.pdf>

Nous: #44
Time:
Date: 1968.4.20
Torah: #40 #2 #5 %81 = #47
Dao: Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts
Tetra: #36 - Strength
I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action,
The key, God

Latin: Amabilis {Conservative God} Alt: Yahhael {God is the God} {

1. PROTECTS & HELPS AGAINST THOSE WISHING TO USURP THE FORTUNES OF OTHERS
2. JUSTICE, TRUTH & LIBERTY
3. PROTECTS TRUTH, LOVERS OF JURISPRUDENCE
4. Thesogar
}

Solar Eclipse: 20 March 2015 (AEST)

Heber {The region beyond, One that passes; anger}
Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#401 / #383} / HETEROS {#417 / #391
*HOMOIOS* *ANTAGONISM* *AGAINST* *INTELLECTUS* *AS* *GENATIVE*
*VOLUNTĀTUS*}

<http://grapple369.com?zen:6,row:1,col:8,nous:44>

***@zen: 6, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 44 [Date: 2018.4.20, Super: #401 /
#63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake,
Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt, Ego:
#383 / #44 - Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang,
Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 -
Strength]

#383 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #70, #200] = logios (G3052): {#11 as #383} 1)
learned, a man of letters, skilled in literature and the arts, esp. versed
in history and the antiquities; 2) skilled in speech, eloquent; 3)
rational, wise;

ORATOR@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 19; Ego: 70,
#3: Sup: 22; Ego: 3,
#4: Sup: 32; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 21; Ego: 70,
#6: Sup: 59; Ego: 38,
Male: 183; Female: 221
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,183}&idea:{f,221}>

SUPER (MALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #21 - Guiding the
Physical, Emptying the Heart; I-Ching: H31 - Reciprocity, Conjoining,
Influence (wooing), Feelings; Tetra: 42 - Going to Meet / INNER: #19 -
Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 -
Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 -
Gathering In} #183 has 2 Categories:

#30, #4, #40, #1, #8, #100 = n. Field of Blood (or man), the Western part
of Hinnom {there they are; their riches};

#40, #30, #40, #5, #20, #30, #10 = Weapons of war;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460} 1)
like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like: ie.
corresponding to a thing;

46497636@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 29; Ego: 40,
#3: Sup: 18; Ego: 70,
#4: Sup: 28; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 29; Ego: 1,
#6: Sup: 67; Ego: 38,
Male: 241; Female: 229
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,241}&idea:{f,229}>

#229 as [#5, #50, #5, #100, #3, #5, #10, #1, #50] = energeia (G1753): {#35
as #229} 1) working, efficiency; 1a) in the NT used only of superhuman
power, whether of God or of the Devil;

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341} 1) the management of a household or of household
affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of
other's property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation;

CONTEMPLATE@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 80; Ego: 10,
#3: Sup: 19; Ego: 20,
#4: Sup: 8; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 58; Ego: 50,
#6: Sup: 47; Ego: 70,
#7: Sup: 6; Ego: 40,
#8: Sup: 16; Ego: 10,
#9: Sup: 17; Ego: 1,
#10: Sup: 67; Ego: 50,
Male: 388; Female: 391
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,388}&idea:{f,391}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #64 - Consider
the Small and Insignificant; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint, Inaction, Bound,
Keeping still, Mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 71 - Stoppage / INNER: #19 -
Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 -
Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 -
Gathering In} #388 has 16 Categories:

#388 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #10, #200] = ergon (G2041): {#13 as #228} 1)
business, employment, that which any one is occupied; 2) any product
whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an
act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that
which is less than work; 1a) that which one undertakes to do, enterprise,
undertaking;

A-U-M: #391 as [#40, #40, #70, #30, #5, #200, #6] = n. The Inscrutable
Height --- an alternate title of the 1st Sephira Keter, #20 #400 #200 =
(#620), as the highest of all Sephiroth. There is an indirect association
of this title with Solomon;

#391 as [#5, #2, #4, #70, #40, #70, #200] = hebdomos (G1442): {#10 as #391}
1) seventh;

SEVEN@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 7; Ego: 2,
#3: Sup: 11; Ego: 4,
#4: Sup: 81; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 40; Ego: 40,
#6: Sup: 29; Ego: 70,
#7: Sup: 67; Ego: 38,
Male: 240; Female: 229
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,240}&idea:{f,229}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #78 -
Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersion, Dispersal
(dissolution); Tetra: 47 - Pattern / INNER: #35 - Great Guiding Signs?,
Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 -
Following} #240 has 15 Categories:

#240 as [#9, #10, #3, #8, #10, #200] = thiggano (G2345): {#13 as #876} 1)
to touch, handle; 1a) to do violence to, injury;

“The supreme function {#391 - INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS} of
statesmanship is to provide against preventable #351 - evils. In seeking to
do so, it #224 - encounters #288 - obstacles which are deeply #231 - rooted
in human nature.” [Enoch Powell’s Speech: Rivers Of Blood 20 April 1968]

That strategy to decrypting the consciousness of intention which I would
adopt to the parsing of his speech is to firstly acquaint oneself with the
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set {

#229 as [#5, #4, #200, #500] = derek (H1870): {#4 as #229} 1) way, road,
distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c) direction;
1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of moral
character (fig.);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of
moral character (fig.)}

#229 as [#30, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsedaqah (H6666): {#16 as #229} 1)
justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS (*IN* *GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of
judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic king Messiah; 1b)
righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c) righteousness (in a case or cause);
1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right);
1f) righteousness (as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God;
1f2) prosperity (of people); 1g) righteous acts;

} associated to the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING highlighted above and then
appraise such EVENT against any records of parliamentary statements as
temporal references determined from any TELOS hierarchy associated to such
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.

ANGEL GENII CORRESPONDENCES TO MOON (#369 = DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN
NATURE) AS ACT OF NATURE AND THE ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE)

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

#419 as [#6, #2, #5, #6, #400] = havvah (H1942): {#1 as #16 (*)
*INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #120 / #360} 1) desire; 2) chasm
(fig. of destruction); 1a) desire (in bad sense); 2a) engulfing ruin,
destruction, calamity;

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (fig.);

48 8 64
56 40 24
16(*) 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{120}&idea:{360}>

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels) = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A* *BOUNDLESS*
*AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED* *HIS*
*BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of
moral character (fig.)}

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

That is a five minute synopsis which is my immediate impression from only
the first statement of his speech which having now conveyed may give cause
for others to reconsider their own appraisal.

Having said that, I will read the speech in light of such disclosure.

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Damascus.pdf>

Initial Post: 14 April 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-04-14 21:26:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
— ONLY BY RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG {#224 /
#229} HE WAS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 April 2018

EDITORIAL (INDEPENDENT.CO.UK) @ 2001 HOURS ON 14 APRIL 2018: “ONLY BY
RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG HE WAS.

So far as can be judged the BBC’s treatment is ideally suited to Powell’s
speech. For every paragraph contained assumptions, delusions, sly elisions
and, more than likely, partial or complete fabrications.

For that we should be grateful, and is that not also a reason to bury
Powell’s words, rather than to resurrect them?

No, because every nation has a duty to face up to its past, as the BBC will
also be doing in a landmark documentary series next week on Stephen
Lawrence. Powell’s views also need attention because, whether consciously
or not, there are still many who hold the view that what Powell was saying
was right: specifically that someone of black or brown skin – or, nowadays,
of Eastern European heritage – cannot be ‘British’, or at least would find
it difficult to be so.

That, in essence, was the base of Powellism, and, as we see all around us
every day, why Enoch has in due course been proved wrong. For black, Asian
and other ethnic minority communities made and are making still an
outstanding contribution to British life. They are British, the same as
anyone else, and proud of it.”

<https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/enoch-powell-speech-bbc-radio-4-how-wrong-he-was-a8303416.html>

The immediate problem is the OPPORTUNISM provided by the in situ CATEGORIES
OF UNDERSTANDING of #224 / #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of
War assigned to Roman Empire Governance Transformation Prototype #EIGHT
{#120 / #360} and #342 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs assigned to Roman
Empire Governance Prototype #SIX {#114 / #342} which could lead to an
implicit bias as acquiescence that is granted towards HETEROS {ie.
essentially racialism: @1 - marriage / @5 - phallus as patrimony
traditional family values} rather than HOMOIOS {ie. a better paradigm for a
multi-cultural society} derived governance and which may be consistent with
his national / organisational / educational identity as ideological
premise:

“John Enoch Powell MBE (16 June 1912 – 8 February 1998), was a British
politician, classical scholar, *PHILOLOGIST* and poet. He served as a
Conservative Member of Parliament (MP, 1950–74), Ulster Unionist Party
(UUP) MP (1974–87), and Minister of Health (1960–63).

*PHILOLOGIST* (noun):
- the study of literary texts and of written records, the establishment of
their authenticity and their original form, and the determination of their
meaning.
- (especially in older use) linguistics, especially historical and
comparative linguistics.
- Obsolete. the love of learning and literature.

ORIGIN: 1350–1400; Middle English philologie < Latin philologia; Greek
philología love of learning and literature, equivalent to philólog(os)
literary, studious, argumentative.

Before entering politics, Powell was a classical scholar, becoming a full
professor of ancient Greek at the age of 25 in Australia. During World War
II, he served in both staff and intelligence positions, reaching the rank
of brigadier in his early thirties. He also wrote poetry {cf: observe his
dialectic}; his first works being published in 1937, as well as many books
on classical and political subjects.

Powell became a national figure following his 20 April 1968 address to the
General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre,
which became known as the “Rivers of Blood” speech. It pointedly criticised
mass immigration into the UK, especially from the New Commonwealth and
opposed the then–proposed anti-discrimination legislation Race Relations
Bill being mooted at the time. In response, Conservative Party leader
Edward Heath sacked Powell from his position as Shadow Defence Secretary
(1965–1968) in the Conservative opposition.”
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell>]

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGE: Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie.
hymeneal as marriage / sovereign dynamic v’s Jewish Torah Intellectus as
Genitive Voluntātus} Empire Governance]

THE QUEEN, THE POPE AND ENOCH POWELL
Papal jurisdiction was the subject of a memorable letter to The Times by
Enoch Powell (then an Ulster Unionist MP) published on 24th March 1982, on
the eve of Pope John Paul II’s visit to Great Britain.

Powell concluded that it is ‘constitutionally and logically impossible for
England to contain both the Queen and the Pope’, on account of their
conflicting claims of authority.  The Queen is ‘on earth the Supreme
Governor of the Church of England’, the Pope is ‘Christ’s Vicar upon the
earth’.

It is significant that the word earth is used twice.  Powell sees authority
in territorial rather than functional terms.

The letter implies that the Pope’s claim includes a claim of territorial
jurisdiction over England.  However, canon 331 of the Code of Canon Law
1983 describes the Pope as ‘Vicar of Christ and pastor of the Universal
Church on earth’.  In that capacity, the Pope enjoys ‘supreme, full,
immediate and universal ordinary power in the Church’.

Thus canon 331 does not exactly describe the Pope as Vicar of Christ upon
the earth.  It does not claim a political jurisdiction over the earth.  The
Pope’s authority is over the Church, rather than over the earth.  His
jurisdiction is limited to the Church.

Canon 747 reinforces this point.  It provides that the Church ‘has the
innate duty and right to preach the Gospel to all nations, independent of
any human power whatever … to announce moral principles, including those
pertaining to the social order, and to make judgments on any human
affairs’.

This account of papal jurisdiction makes clear that it is religious, not
political.  It extends no further than the proclamation of the Christian
religion, as the Church defines this.

It may, of course, be objected that there can be no dichotomy between the
religious and the political.  The Pope’s claim to be Vicar of Christ is
religious.  The Church’s duty to proclaim the Gospel is likewise a
religious duty, derived from the Lord’s command to make disciples of all
nations.  However, the Church’s ability to proclaim the Gospel to all
nations is relevant to the governments of those nations.

To this extent the Church’s right to preach the Gospel is a political
question, as well as a religious one.  The duty to proclaim the Gospel is a
religious matter.  The right to proclaim the Gospel in a particular nation
is a political matter.

The political right of the Church to proclaim the Gospel, asserted in canon
747, is based on the principle of religious freedom, not any claim
of territorial jurisdiction.  Canon 11 of the 1983 Code makes clear that
‘merely ecclesiastical laws bind [only] those baptised in the Catholic
Church or received into it’.  Canon 748(2) is emphatic that ‘Persons cannot
ever be forced … to embrace the Catholic faith against their conscience’.

This answers Powell’s suggestion that the Pope’s claim to be Vicar of
Christ conflicts with the Monarch’s supremacy over the Church of England. 
The Church of England is obviously not part of the Roman Catholic Church. 
Thus members of the Church of England are not expected to observe Roman
Catholic laws or embrace the Catholic faith, unless they freely choose to
do so.

The Monarch likewise permits her Catholic subjects to practice their
religion.  The Pope makes no political claim on England, only a religious
claim.  The Monarch makes a political claim on her Catholic subjects, but
no religious claim.  A conflict of territorial claims is avoided by mutual
acceptance of the principle of religious freedom.

Acceptance of religious freedom resolves political difficulties but not
religious ones.  The real difficulty between the Monarch and the Pope lies
not in any political claim over England, but in the Roman Catholic
religious teaching that the Church of England, of which the Monarch is
Supreme Governor, is not part of the Catholic Church.

It must be remembered that the Code of Canon Law was not promulgated until
1983, the year after Powell wrote his letter.  However, the Code itself is
based on the teaching of the second Vatican Council, which dates from the
1960s.

<https://ecclesiasticallaw.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/the-queen-the-pope-and-enoch-powell/>

HISTORICAL PARALLELISM: “Yea, ye took up the tabernacle {ie. PYTHAGOREAN
binomial conception of the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER} of Moloch {Caesar /
Pontifex Maximus as King}, and the star of your god Remphan {ie. the
combined Angelic genius Ou’RaEL = Vav (#6) + Resh (#200) + Aleph (#1) +
Lamed (#30) as derived from a 3x3 = #15 (9) matrix which is used as a
template to formulate the values for various elements as being inclusive of
AIR: #114 (#342 {ie. #341 + @1 as Cardinal Sin}) + #123 (#369) = #237 -
*USE* *OF* *FORCE*}, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will
carry you away beyond Babylon {incongruity; confusion; mixture as distinct
from congruity and ratiocination} / Damascus {a sack full of blood; the
similitude of burning}.” [Acts 7:42-43; 9:2 (KJV)]

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Stoicheion.pdf>

Nous: #44
Time:
Date: 1968.4.20
Torah: #40 #2 #5 %81 = #47
Dao: Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts
Tetra: #36 - Strength
I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action,
The key, God

Latin: Amabilis {Conservative God} Alt: Yahhael {God is the God} {

1. PROTECTS & HELPS AGAINST THOSE WISHING TO USURP THE FORTUNES OF OTHERS
2. JUSTICE, TRUTH & LIBERTY
3. PROTECTS TRUTH, LOVERS OF JURISPRUDENCE
4. Thesogar
}

Solar Eclipse: 20 March 2015 (AEST)

Heber {The region beyond, One that passes; anger}
Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#401 / #383} / HETEROS {#417 / #391
*HOMOIOS* *ANTAGONISM* *AGAINST* *INTELLECTUS* *AS* *GENATIVE*
*VOLUNTĀTUS*}

<http://grapple369.com?zen:6,row:1,col:8,nous:44>

***@zen: 6, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 44 [Date: 2018.4.20, Super: #401 /
#63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake,
Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt, Ego:
#383 / #44 - Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang,
Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 -
Strength]

#383 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #70, #200] = logios (G3052): {#11 as #383} 1)
learned, a man of letters, skilled in literature and the arts, esp. versed
in history and the antiquities; 2) skilled in speech, eloquent; 3)
rational, wise;

ORATOR@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 19; Ego: 70,
#3: Sup: 22; Ego: 3,
#4: Sup: 32; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 21; Ego: 70,
#6: Sup: 59; Ego: 38,
Male: 183; Female: 221
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,183}&idea:{f,221}>

SUPER (MALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #21 - Guiding the
Physical, Emptying the Heart; I-Ching: H31 - Reciprocity, Conjoining,
Influence (wooing), Feelings; Tetra: 42 - Going to Meet / INNER: #19 -
Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 -
Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 -
Gathering In} #183 has 2 Categories:

#30, #4, #40, #1, #8, #100 = n. Field of Blood (or man), the Western part
of Hinnom {there they are; their riches};

#40, #30, #40, #5, #20, #30, #10 = Weapons of war;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460} 1)
like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like: ie.
corresponding to a thing;

46497636@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 29; Ego: 40,
#3: Sup: 18; Ego: 70,
#4: Sup: 28; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 29; Ego: 1,
#6: Sup: 67; Ego: 38,
Male: 241; Female: 229
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,241}&idea:{f,229}>

#229 as [#5, #50, #5, #100, #3, #5, #10, #1, #50] = energeia (G1753): {#35
as #229} 1) working, efficiency; 1a) in the NT used only of superhuman
power, whether of God or of the Devil;

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341} 1) the management of a household or of household
affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of
other’s property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation;

CONTEMPLATE@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 80; Ego: 10,
#3: Sup: 19; Ego: 20,
#4: Sup: 8; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 58; Ego: 50,
#6: Sup: 47; Ego: 70,
#7: Sup: 6; Ego: 40,
#8: Sup: 16; Ego: 10,
#9: Sup: 17; Ego: 1,
#10: Sup: 67; Ego: 50,
Male: 388; Female: 391
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,388}&idea:{f,391}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #64 - Consider
the Small and Insignificant; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint, Inaction, Bound,
Keeping still, Mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 71 - Stoppage / INNER: #19 -
Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 -
Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 -
Gathering In} #388 has 16 Categories:

#388 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #10, #200] = ergon (G2041): {#13 as #228} 1)
business, employment, that which any one is occupied; 2) any product
whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an
act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that
which is less than work; 1a) that which one undertakes to do, enterprise,
undertaking;

A-U-M: #391 as [#40, #40, #70, #30, #5, #200, #6] = n. The Inscrutable
Height — an alternate title of the 1st Sephira Keter, #20 #400 #200 =
(#620), as the highest of all Sephiroth. There is an indirect association
of this title with Solomon;

#391 as [#5, #2, #4, #70, #40, #70, #200] = hebdomos (G1442): {#10 as #391}
1) seventh;

SEVEN@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 7; Ego: 2,
#3: Sup: 11; Ego: 4,
#4: Sup: 81; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 40; Ego: 40,
#6: Sup: 29; Ego: 70,
#7: Sup: 67; Ego: 38,
Male: 240; Female: 229
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,240}&idea:{f,229}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #78 -
Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersion, Dispersal
(dissolution); Tetra: 47 - Pattern / INNER: #35 - Great Guiding Signs?,
Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 -
Following} #240 has 15 Categories:

#240 as [#9, #10, #3, #8, #10, #200] = thiggano (G2345): {#13 as #876} 1)
to touch, handle; 1a) to do violence to, injury;

“The supreme function {#391 - INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS} of
statesmanship is to provide against preventable #351 - evils. In seeking to
do so, it #224 - encounters #288 - obstacles which are deeply #231 - rooted
in human nature.” [Enoch Powell’s Speech: Rivers Of Blood 20 April 1968]

YOUTUBE: “Teddy Bear’s PIcnic”



Why is it you always get wound up with such passion plays at this time of
year?

— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —

“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.

TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.

VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

No doubt you have to justify a church wedding and vows made to #351 -
BELIAL.

Has it got something to do with the Fuhrer’s birthday and you need some
sacrifice for the memorial altar which you intend to dance naked around in
the forest at midnight mass.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/FACEBOOK%20DEATH%20THREAT%2020180401%200541%20HRS.pdf>

That strategy to decrypting the consciousness of intention which I would
adopt to the parsing of his speech is to firstly acquaint oneself with the
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set {

#229 as [#5, #4, #200, #500] = derek (H1870): {#4 as #229} 1) way, road,
distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c) direction;
1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of moral
character (fig.);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of
moral character (fig.)}

#229 as [#30, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsedaqah (H6666): {#16 as #229} 1)
justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS (*IN* *GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of
judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic king Messiah; 1b)
righteousness (of God’s attribute); 1c) righteousness (in a case or cause);
1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right);
1f) righteousness (as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God;
1f2) prosperity (of people); 1g) righteous acts;

} associated to the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING highlighted above and then
appraise such EVENT against any records of parliamentary statements as
temporal references determined from any TELOS hierarchy associated to such
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.

ANGEL GENII CORRESPONDENCES TO MOON (#369 = DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN
NATURE) AS ACT OF NATURE AND THE ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE)

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = ‘avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

#419 as [#6, #2, #5, #6, #400] = havvah (H1942): {#1 as #16 (*)
*INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #120 / #360} 1) desire; 2) chasm
(fig. of destruction); 1a) desire (in bad sense); 2a) engulfing ruin,
destruction, calamity;

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (fig.);

48 8 64
56 40 24
16(*) 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{120}&idea:{360}>

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels) = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <— [*HITLER’S* *TABLE* *TALK* IDEA
@120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM): One
day the English will realise that they’ve nothing to gain in Europe... *IF*
*THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they can’t let
India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can’t bet on both tables. When it’s a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A* *BOUNDLESS*
*AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED* *HIS*
*BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER’S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of
moral character (fig.)}

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

That is a five minute synopsis which is my immediate impression from only
the first statement of his speech which having now conveyed may give cause
for others to reconsider their own appraisal.

I ought not cast aspersions but in the same manner that Enoch Powell’s
statements may give cause to argue that he whilst not entirely disloyal to
British Sovereignty was seemingly engaged within subterfuge as dislocation
of the STATE in preparation of its eventual dissolution in submission to
Papal Authority which will not now occur because of the ‘forty years’ Dead
Sea Scrolls connection to the dialog within the Acts of Apostles
establishing Britain’s Sovereignty over that of Papal authority (an emperor
with no clothes).

But the consideration is then one of ambiguity over loyalty by Members of
Parliament and that if such could occur within Britain as undetected even
by Intelligence Agencies.

Could it not also occur within Russia where its political / oligarchy /
Intelligence Agencies might also be operating with a distorted loyalty
which has an Institutional Imperative (vis a vis Saint Andrews cause
célèbre) that is ambivalent to the State.

Thus if some act is alleged perpetuated by a Russian actor, it does not
necessarily mean it’s accountability is then the State but a corruption of
its Authority.

Having said that, I will read the speech in light of such disclosure.

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Damascus.pdf>

Initial Post: 14 April 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-04-14 23:06:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
— ONLY BY RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG {#224 /
#229} HE WAS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 April 2018

EDITORIAL (INDEPENDENT.CO.UK) @ 2001 HOURS ON 14 APRIL 2018: “ONLY BY
RECALLING ENOCH POWELL’S WORDS WILL WE REALISE HOW WRONG HE WAS.

So far as can be judged the BBC’s treatment is ideally suited to Powell’s
speech. For every paragraph contained assumptions, delusions, sly elisions
and, more than likely, partial or complete fabrications.

For that we should be grateful, and is that not also a reason to bury
Powell’s words, rather than to resurrect them?

No, because every nation has a duty to face up to its past, as the BBC will
also be doing in a landmark documentary series next week on Stephen
Lawrence. Powell’s views also need attention because, whether consciously
or not, there are still many who hold the view that what Powell was saying
was right: specifically that someone of black or brown skin – or, nowadays,
of Eastern European heritage – cannot be ‘British’, or at least would find
it difficult to be so.

That, in essence, was the base of Powellism, and, as we see all around us
every day, why Enoch has in due course been proved wrong. For black, Asian
and other ethnic minority communities made and are making still an
outstanding contribution to British life. They are British, the same as
anyone else, and proud of it.”

<https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/enoch-powell-speech-bbc-radio-4-how-wrong-he-was-a8303416.html>

The immediate problem is the OPPORTUNISM provided by the in situ CATEGORIES
OF UNDERSTANDING of #224 / #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of
War assigned to Roman Empire Governance Transformation Prototype #EIGHT
{#120 / #360} and #342 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs assigned to Roman
Empire Governance Prototype #SIX {#114 / #342} which could lead to an
implicit bias as acquiescence that is granted towards HETEROS {ie.
essentially racialism: @1 - marriage / @5 - phallus as patrimony
traditional family values} rather than HOMOIOS {ie. a better paradigm for a
multi-cultural society} derived governance and which may be consistent with
his national / organisational / educational identity as ideological
premise:

“John Enoch Powell MBE (16 June 1912 – 8 February 1998), was a British
politician, classical scholar, *PHILOLOGIST* and poet. He served as a
Conservative Member of Parliament (MP, 1950–74), Ulster Unionist Party
(UUP) MP (1974–87), and Minister of Health (1960–63).

*PHILOLOGIST* (noun):
- the study of literary texts and of written records, the establishment of
their authenticity and their original form, and the determination of their
meaning.
- (especially in older use) linguistics, especially historical and
comparative linguistics.
- Obsolete. the love of learning and literature.

ORIGIN: 1350–1400; Middle English philologie < Latin philologia; Greek
philología love of learning and literature, equivalent to philólog(os)
literary, studious, argumentative.

Before entering politics, Powell was a classical scholar, becoming a full
professor of ancient Greek at the age of 25 in Australia. During World War
II, he served in both staff and intelligence positions, reaching the rank
of brigadier in his early thirties. He also wrote poetry {cf: observe his
dialectic}; his first works being published in 1937, as well as many books
on classical and political subjects.

Powell became a national figure following his 20 April 1968 address to the
General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre,
which became known as the “Rivers of Blood” speech. It pointedly criticised
mass immigration into the UK, especially from the New Commonwealth and
opposed the then–proposed anti-discrimination legislation Race Relations
Bill being mooted at the time. In response, Conservative Party leader
Edward Heath sacked Powell from his position as Shadow Defence Secretary
(1965–1968) in the Conservative opposition.”
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell>]

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGE: Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie.
hymeneal as marriage / sovereign dynamic v’s Jewish Torah Intellectus as
Genitive Voluntātus} Empire Governance]

THE QUEEN, THE POPE AND ENOCH POWELL
Papal jurisdiction was the subject of a memorable letter to The Times by
Enoch Powell (then an Ulster Unionist MP) published on 24th March 1982, on
the eve of Pope John Paul II’s visit to Great Britain.

Powell concluded that it is ‘constitutionally and logically impossible for
England to contain both the Queen and the Pope’, on account of their
conflicting claims of authority.  The Queen is ‘on earth the Supreme
Governor of the Church of England’, the Pope is ‘Christ’s Vicar upon the
earth’.

It is significant that the word earth is used twice.  Powell sees authority
in territorial rather than functional terms.

The letter implies that the Pope’s claim includes a claim of territorial
jurisdiction over England.  However, canon 331 of the Code of Canon Law
1983 describes the Pope as ‘Vicar of Christ and pastor of the Universal
Church on earth’.  In that capacity, the Pope enjoys ‘supreme, full,
immediate and universal ordinary power in the Church’.

Thus canon 331 does not exactly describe the Pope as Vicar of Christ upon
the earth.  It does not claim a political jurisdiction over the earth.  The
Pope’s authority is over the Church, rather than over the earth.  His
jurisdiction is limited to the Church.

Canon 747 reinforces this point.  It provides that the Church ‘has the
innate duty and right to preach the Gospel to all nations, independent of
any human power whatever … to announce moral principles, including those
pertaining to the social order, and to make judgments on any human
affairs’.

This account of papal jurisdiction makes clear that it is religious, not
political.  It extends no further than the proclamation of the Christian
religion, as the Church defines this.

It may, of course, be objected that there can be no dichotomy between the
religious and the political.  The Pope’s claim to be Vicar of Christ is
religious.  The Church’s duty to proclaim the Gospel is likewise a
religious duty, derived from the Lord’s command to make disciples of all
nations.  However, the Church’s ability to proclaim the Gospel to all
nations is relevant to the governments of those nations.

To this extent the Church’s right to preach the Gospel is a political
question, as well as a religious one.  The duty to proclaim the Gospel is a
religious matter.  The right to proclaim the Gospel in a particular nation
is a political matter.

The political right of the Church to proclaim the Gospel, asserted in canon
747, is based on the principle of religious freedom, not any claim
of territorial jurisdiction.  Canon 11 of the 1983 Code makes clear that
‘merely ecclesiastical laws bind [only] those baptised in the Catholic
Church or received into it’.  Canon 748(2) is emphatic that ‘Persons cannot
ever be forced … to embrace the Catholic faith against their conscience’.

This answers Powell’s suggestion that the Pope’s claim to be Vicar of
Christ conflicts with the Monarch’s supremacy over the Church of England. 
The Church of England is obviously not part of the Roman Catholic Church. 
Thus members of the Church of England are not expected to observe Roman
Catholic laws or embrace the Catholic faith, unless they freely choose to
do so.

The Monarch likewise permits her Catholic subjects to practice their
religion.  The Pope makes no political claim on England, only a religious
claim.  The Monarch makes a political claim on her Catholic subjects, but
no religious claim.  A conflict of territorial claims is avoided by mutual
acceptance of the principle of religious freedom.

Acceptance of religious freedom resolves political difficulties but not
religious ones.  The real difficulty between the Monarch and the Pope lies
not in any political claim over England, but in the Roman Catholic
religious teaching that the Church of England, of which the Monarch is
Supreme Governor, is not part of the Catholic Church.

It must be remembered that the Code of Canon Law was not promulgated until
1983, the year after Powell wrote his letter.  However, the Code itself is
based on the teaching of the second Vatican Council, which dates from the
1960s.

<https://ecclesiasticallaw.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/the-queen-the-pope-and-enoch-powell/>

HISTORICAL PARALLELISM: “Yea, ye took up the tabernacle {ie. PYTHAGOREAN
binomial conception of the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER} of Moloch {Caesar /
Pontifex Maximus as King}, and the star of your god Remphan {ie. the
combined Angelic genius Ou’RaEL = Vav (#6) + Resh (#200) + Aleph (#1) +
Lamed (#30) as derived from a 3x3 = #15 (9) matrix which is used as a
template to formulate the values for various elements as being inclusive of
AIR: #114 (#342 {ie. #341 + @1 as Cardinal Sin}) + #123 (#369) = #237 -
*USE* *OF* *FORCE*}, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will
carry you away beyond Babylon {incongruity; confusion; mixture as distinct
from congruity and ratiocination} / Damascus {a sack full of blood; the
similitude of burning}.” [Acts 7:42-43; 9:2 (KJV)]

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Stoicheion.pdf>

Nous: #44
Time:
Date: 1968.4.20
Torah: #40 #2 #5 %81 = #47
Dao: Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts
Tetra: #36 - Strength
I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action,
The key, God

Latin: Amabilis {Conservative God} Alt: Yahhael {God is the God} {

1. PROTECTS & HELPS AGAINST THOSE WISHING TO USURP THE FORTUNES OF OTHERS
2. JUSTICE, TRUTH & LIBERTY
3. PROTECTS TRUTH, LOVERS OF JURISPRUDENCE
4. Thesogar
}

Solar Eclipse: 20 March 2015 (AEST)

Heber {The region beyond, One that passes; anger}
Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#401 / #383} / HETEROS {#417 / #391
*HOMOIOS* *ANTAGONISM* *AGAINST* *INTELLECTUS* *AS* *GENATIVE*
*VOLUNTĀTUS*}

<http://grapple369.com?zen:6,row:1,col:8,nous:44>

***@zen: 6, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 44 [Date: 2018.4.20, Super: #401 /
#63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake,
Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt, Ego:
#383 / #44 - Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang,
Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 -
Strength]

#383 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #70, #200] = logios (G3052): {#11 as #383} 1)
learned, a man of letters, skilled in literature and the arts, esp. versed
in history and the antiquities; 2) skilled in speech, eloquent; 3)
rational, wise;

ORATOR@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 19; Ego: 70,
#3: Sup: 22; Ego: 3,
#4: Sup: 32; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 21; Ego: 70,
#6: Sup: 59; Ego: 38,
Male: 183; Female: 221
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,183}&idea:{f,221}>

SUPER (MALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #21 - Guiding the
Physical, Emptying the Heart; I-Ching: H31 - Reciprocity, Conjoining,
Influence (wooing), Feelings; Tetra: 42 - Going to Meet / INNER: #19 -
Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 -
Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 -
Gathering In} #183 has 2 Categories:

#30, #4, #40, #1, #8, #100 = n. Field of Blood (or man), the Western part
of Hinnom {there they are; their riches};

#40, #30, #40, #5, #20, #30, #10 = Weapons of war;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460} 1)
like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like: ie.
corresponding to a thing;

INTELLECTUS@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 29; Ego: 40,
#3: Sup: 18; Ego: 70,
#4: Sup: 28; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 29; Ego: 1,
#6: Sup: 67; Ego: 38,
Male: 241; Female: 229
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,241}&idea:{f,229}>

#229 as [#5, #50, #5, #100, #3, #5, #10, #1, #50] = energeia (G1753): {#35
as #229} 1) working, efficiency; 1a) in the NT used only of superhuman
power, whether of God or of the Devil;

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341} 1) the management of a household or of household
affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of
other’s property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation;

CONTEMPLATE@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 80; Ego: 10,
#3: Sup: 19; Ego: 20,
#4: Sup: 8; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 58; Ego: 50,
#6: Sup: 47; Ego: 70,
#7: Sup: 6; Ego: 40,
#8: Sup: 16; Ego: 10,
#9: Sup: 17; Ego: 1,
#10: Sup: 67; Ego: 50,
Male: 388; Female: 391
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,388}&idea:{f,391}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #64 - Consider
the Small and Insignificant; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint, Inaction, Bound,
Keeping still, Mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 71 - Stoppage / INNER: #19 -
Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 -
Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 -
Gathering In} #388 has 16 Categories:

#388 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #10, #200] = ergon (G2041): {#13 as #228} 1)
business, employment, that which any one is occupied; 2) any product
whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an
act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that
which is less than work; 1a) that which one undertakes to do, enterprise,
undertaking;

A-U-M: #391 as [#40, #40, #70, #30, #5, #200, #6] = n. The Inscrutable
Height — an alternate title of the 1st Sephira Keter, #20 #400 #200 =
(#620), as the highest of all Sephiroth. There is an indirect association
of this title with Solomon;

#391 as [#5, #2, #4, #70, #40, #70, #200] = hebdomos (G1442): {#10 as #391}
1) seventh;

SEVEN@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 7; Ego: 2,
#3: Sup: 11; Ego: 4,
#4: Sup: 81; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 40; Ego: 40,
#6: Sup: 29; Ego: 70,
#7: Sup: 67; Ego: 38,
Male: 240; Female: 229
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,240}&idea:{f,229}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #78 -
Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersion, Dispersal
(dissolution); Tetra: 47 - Pattern / INNER: #35 - Great Guiding Signs?,
Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 -
Following} #240 has 15 Categories:

#240 as [#9, #10, #3, #8, #10, #200] = thiggano (G2345): {#13 as #876} 1)
to touch, handle; 1a) to do violence to, injury;

“The supreme function {#391 - INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS} of
statesmanship is to provide against preventable #351 - evils. In seeking to
do so, it #224 - encounters #288 - obstacles which are deeply #231 - rooted
in human nature.” [Enoch Powell’s Speech: Rivers Of Blood 20 April 1968]

YOUTUBE: “Teddy Bear’s Picnic”

http://youtu.be/YDndFOtBy-E

Why is it you always get wound up with such passion plays at this time of
year?

— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —

“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.

TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.

VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”

No doubt you have to justify a church wedding and vows made to #351 -
BELIAL.

Has it got something to do with the Fuhrer’s birthday and you need some
sacrifice for the memorial altar which you intend to dance naked around in
the forest at midnight mass.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/FACEBOOK%20DEATH%20THREAT%2020180401%200541%20HRS.pdf>

That strategy to decrypting the consciousness of intention which I would
adopt to the parsing of his speech is to firstly acquaint oneself with the
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set {

#229 as [#5, #4, #200, #500] = derek (H1870): {#4 as #229} 1) way, road,
distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c) direction;
1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of moral
character (fig.);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of
moral character (fig.)}

#229 as [#30, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsedaqah (H6666): {#16 as #229} 1)
justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS (*IN* *GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of
judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic king Messiah; 1b)
righteousness (of God’s attribute); 1c) righteousness (in a case or cause);
1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right);
1f) righteousness (as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God;
1f2) prosperity (of people); 1g) righteous acts;

} associated to the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING highlighted above and then
appraise such EVENT against any records of parliamentary statements as
temporal references determined from any TELOS hierarchy associated to such
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.

ANGEL GENII CORRESPONDENCES TO MOON (#369 = DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN
NATURE) AS ACT OF NATURE AND THE ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE)

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = ‘avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

#419 as [#6, #2, #5, #6, #400] = havvah (H1942): {#1 as #16 (*)
*INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #120 / #360} 1) desire; 2) chasm
(fig. of destruction); 1a) desire (in bad sense); 2a) engulfing ruin,
destruction, calamity;

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (fig.);

48 8 64
56 40 24
16(*) 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{120}&idea:{360}>

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels) = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <— [*HITLER’S* *TABLE* *TALK* IDEA
@120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM): One
day the English will realise that they’ve nothing to gain in Europe... *IF*
*THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they can’t let
India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can’t bet on both tables. When it’s a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A* *BOUNDLESS*
*AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED* *HIS*
*BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER’S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (fig.); 1f) of
moral character (fig.)}

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

YOUTUBE: “The Ants Go Marching One By One”



That is a five minute synopsis which is my immediate impression from only
the first statement of his speech which having now conveyed may give cause
for others to reconsider their own appraisal.

I ought not cast aspersions but in the same manner that Enoch Powell’s
statements may give cause to argue that he whilst not entirely disloyal to
British Sovereignty was seemingly engaged within subterfuge as dislocation
of the STATE in preparation of its eventual dissolution in submission to
Papal Authority which will not now occur because of the ‘forty years’ Dead
Sea Scrolls connection to the dialog within the Acts of Apostles
establishing Britain’s Sovereignty over that of Papal authority (an emperor
with no clothes).

But the consideration is then one of ambiguity over loyalty by Members of
Parliament and that if such could occur within Britain as undetected even
by Intelligence Agencies.

Could it not also occur within Russia where its political / oligarchy /
Intelligence Agencies might also be operating with a distorted loyalty
which has an Institutional Imperative (vis a vis Saint Andrews cause
célèbre) that is ambivalent to the State.

Thus if some act is alleged perpetuated by a Russian actor, it does not
necessarily mean it’s accountability is then the State but a corruption of
its Authority.

Having said that, I will read the speech in light of such disclosure.

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Damascus.pdf>

Initial Post: 14 April 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...